A bill was introduced by state Representative Karl Rhoads of Hawaii earlier this year that seeks to make the metric system mandatory within his state. Called “Relating to the Metric System,” H.B. 36 states in part:
The legislature finds that very strong economic and scientific reasons exist for states to switch to the metric system. Other than Burma and Liberia, the United States is the only country that has not switched to the metric system. The cost of not switching to the metric system is quickly increasing with the trend towards globalization. Failing to switch could result in the United States losing its competitive edge in science and technology, as well as continuing to create bilateral trade impediments with other countries.
The cost of switching to a metric system could be quickly outweighed by the economic benefits of global interoperability. This is particularly important as the dominance of United States companies is being challenged in the competitive atmosphere of globalization. Switching to the metric system would likely result in the creation of many jobs, and enable the current and future workforce of the United States to be more prepared to work in the international marketplace.
It also stipulates that the law would go into effect on January 1, 2018. (http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/measure_indiv.aspx?billtype=HB&billnumber=36)
There has been some traffic on the U.S. Metric Association’s listserve (which anyone can join for free) on this topic and some concerns were raised regarding the potential legality of such a law since it might run counter to federal laws regarding labeling.
I do know that “The act to authorize the use of the metric system of weights and measures” from 1866 states:
It shall be lawful throughout the United States of America to employ the weights and measures of the metric system; and no contract or dealing, or pleading in any court, shall be deemed invalid or liable to objection because the weights or measures expressed or referred to therein are weights or measures of the metric system.
I don’t have the legal background or financial resources to address this issue right now but I do know that states’ rights issues are relevant in this matter. (As I’ve said before, we’re less the UNITED States of America than we are the United STATES of America. Full metric implementation could be difficult without states’ cooperation.) I had also hypothesized that perhaps it was Hawaii’s shorter exposure to our metric-adoption struggles that helped it along this path but after speaking with Representative Rhoades, there was another, more practical reason (in addition to those listed in H.B. 36 above): tourism.
According to the Hawaii Tourism Authority:
Hawaii’s visitor industry continues to be the largest generator of jobs among the major industry sectors in the state, providing 152,864 jobs in 2010…Tourism is also the largest source of private capital into the Hawaiian Islands, contributing $11.4 billion in visitor spending and $1 billion in tax revenue last year.
As the Representative pointed out to me, visitors go to Hawaii from all over the world. (And why wouldn’t they? I know I’d like to visit.) Increasingly, people from other countries travel to Hawaii and are tripped up by our illogical measurement system on everything from road signs to fuel to groceries (my words, not his).
He hopes that a change to the metric system will not only make it easier for international visitors but that such a transition won’t cause problems for the rest of the country since Hawaii is physically isolated. (Of course, there’s still all the practical reasons listed above why we should all move over to metric.)
I applaud Representative Rhoads for his efforts and while his bill will need reintroduction next year, there is something we can do to help this work along. If you can vote in Hawaii, write to your representatives urging them to support this legislation. Know someone who lives in Hawaii? Clue them in to what’s going on so they can light a fire under those who influence the state’s government. For a complete list of Hawaii state legislators, go to http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/members/legislators.aspx?chamber=H for the House and http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/members/legislators.aspx?chamber=S for the Senate.
While such efforts might not seem to be seminal, by getting forward movement in enough different places, it just might be enough to change the world…oh wait…the rest of the world has changed, it’s us who are lagging behind.
The time to get with the rest of the world is now.
Join my mailing list by sending an email to firstname.lastname@example.org! Exciting stuff is coming soon and you’ll be the first to know.
I am very excited about this! The year 2018 seems too long for me to wait, but American SI advocates have been waiting since 1866, so I guess when you see it from a long-term perspective, 2018 does not seem so far away. So many good things come from Hawaii, including my favourite United States president, Barack Obama. I certainly hope that Hawaii turns out to be one more catalyst to kick-start America towards a National Metrication Policy. I totally agree with Linda when she says the time to get with the rest of the world is now. But it will not happen without American SI advocates working hard to educate other Americans. Make SI part of your life now so that America can benefit in the long run. Thanks, Linda, for another informative blog post!
The 2018 is just an arbitrary date. The actual date for legislation is decided in committee.
Finally.. I’m ready. It seems everyone in my generation is ready. Alaska should also be in a good position to do this.. I could see washington being next, since they border the sea and canada. That would probably be enough to push me to move there.
Pingback: Shortchanging American Children with Our Measurement System | More Than A Mile Behind: America and the Metric System
I don’t like to be negative, but the 2018 date sounds to me like an excuse to do nothing for five years. In five years, the legislature may well have forgotten about it, and the act could well become a dead letter. Beware the Clayton’s reform, the reform you propose when you don’t want reform. This apparent step forward could turn into a slow no.
Pingback: Linda’s Series of Fortunate Events* | More Than A Mile Behind: America and the Metric System
This bill has been carried over to the 2014 legislative session! time to mobilize support!
You guys gotta switch to metric soon.
We switched in my country back in 1875, from our “original” national units, unlike the united states, who modified the British Units 🙂
I hope you guys catch up with us soon as well, 😀 I unfortunately don’t see it happening though 😦
Pingback: 1.5% Swiss milk = 3% US milk | Two Small Potatoes
What happened? Is it still process? Is it cancelled? I heard Oregon is also trying to do the same, but there aren’t any news or anything, almost no one is talking about this. Hope this happens down here in Florida soon.
SB360 and HB399 were introduced this year but appeared to be dead for the legislative session. You can view more here – http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/measurekeywordsearch.aspx?query=metric
Brauilo Laguna – You can sign up to follow Oregon Metric Senate Bill SB166 here with e-Subscribe: https://olis.leg.state.or.us/liz/2015R1/Measures/Overview/SB166
Thank you, I just subscribed. Do you know if there’s somewhere to subscribe for the Hawaii build?
Simply search for “metric” under keywords
Pingback: 1.5% Swiss milk = 3% US milk - Two Small Potatoes